Agnotic Technologies Logo
    Authorization paperwork and payer forms on a desk
    Revenue Cycle · AI Agent

    Prior Authorization Automation Agent

    The agent reads the order and payer rules, drafts the authorization packet, and submits it electronically — turning a multi-day fax-and-phone chase into a same-day request with a human sign-off.

    Human-in-the-loopHIPAA-ReadyAudit LoggedFHIR PAS

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve

    Why prior auth is the slowest step in the revenue cycle

    Manual prior auth — reading the order, hunting the payer's medical policy, re-keying it into a portal or fax — is the revenue cycle's slowest step, and every re-key risks the wrong CPT, a missing document, or a denial. The agent pulls the order and clinical data from the EHR over FHIR, matches payer rules, assembles the packet, and submits over X12 278 or FHIR PAS — a coordinator approving every request.

    The prior-auth pipeline, end to end

    From EHR order to submitted 278 to tracked response, with a review gate before every submission.

    Diagram of an EHR-connected prior authorization workflow

    Key Capabilities

    Automation grounded in the CMS Interoperability rule and Da Vinci guides.

    15-Minute Scoping Call

    Payer-rule matching

    Maps the order's ICD-10 and CPT/HCPCS codes to the payer's medical-necessity policy.

    Packet assembly with citations

    Drafts the request with chart evidence for each policy criterion, cited for review.

    X12 278 & FHIR PAS submission

    Submits over X12 278 or the Da Vinci PAS FHIR API — the rails the CMS 2027 API mandate standardizes on.

    Coordinator sign-off gate

    Every request stops for coordinator review before it reaches the payer.

    Response tracking & pend handling

    Reads the 278 response, writes auth numbers back to the EHR, and queues pended requests.

    Who runs it

    Deployment scenarios

    The same agent, tuned to where authorization volume hurts.

    Imaging & radiology

    High-volume MRI/CT authorizations matched to payer policies before scheduling.

    Specialty pharmacy & infusion

    Drug-specific medical-necessity packets with required labs and step-therapy history.

    Surgical scheduling

    Procedure authorizations submitted early so cases aren't delayed for a missing auth.

    Payers & delegated entities

    Standing up FHIR PAS intake ahead of the CMS 2027 API mandate.

    Expected impact once the agent is live

    Directional targets validated against your baseline, never assumed.

    Same-day
    Submission for clean, rule-matched requests
    1 gate
    Human sign-off before every payer submission
    100%
    Requests submitted over 278 / FHIR PAS, no portals

    Compliance-First Healthcare App Development Services Backed by Global Standards

    15-Minute Scoping Call
    01HIPAA logo

    HIPAA

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

    Protect PHI with privacy-first architecture, encrypted storage and transmission, strict access controls, and traceable audit logs.

    02GDPR logo

    GDPR

    General Data Protection Regulation

    Implement lawful consent flows, data minimization, retention controls, and secure processing for sensitive health data.

    03FHIR logo

    FHIR

    Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources

    Enable standardized health data exchange across apps, care teams, and systems through robust FHIR-ready APIs.

    04HL7 logo

    HL7

    Health Level Seven International

    Support enterprise-grade interoperability with HL7-based integrations for records, events, and clinical messaging workflows.

    05HITRUST logo

    HITRUST

    Health Information Trust Alliance

    Align security programs to healthcare-specific control and risk management practices trusted by providers and ecosystem partners.

    06HITECH logo

    HITECH

    Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

    Design with breach notification readiness, digital record safeguards, and operational controls that support regulated care programs.

    07SaMD logo

    SaMD

    FDA Software as a Medical Device

    Plan software quality, traceability, and documentation pathways for products that may require SaMD review and submission.

    08MDR (EU) logo

    MDR (EU)

    Medical Device Regulation (European Union)

    Prepare EU market-ready processes for risk classification, evidence tracking, and lifecycle governance under MDR expectations.

    09SAMHSA logo

    SAMHSA

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

    Apply confidentiality controls and consent-aware sharing models for behavioral and mental health data experiences.

    Standards it speaks

    Transactions and controls

    X12 278FHIR PASFHIR R4CDS HooksHIPAACMS
    How It Works

    Capture → decision → submit → write-back

    Four stages, bounded by payer rules, with human approval before submission.

    1.

    Capture the order

    Ingests the order, diagnosis, and clinical data from the EHR over FHIR R4 (ServiceRequest, Condition, DocumentReference).

    FHIR R4 intake
    2.

    Match rules & draft

    Resolves the payer and plan, matches codes to policy, and drafts the evidence — flagging gaps, not guessing.

    Rule-bounded model
    3.

    Human review & submit

    A coordinator approves or edits; the agent then transmits over X12 278 or FHIR PAS, never without a logged action.

    Sign-off required
    4.

    Track & write back

    Parses the 278 response, writes the auth number back to the EHR, and routes pended cases to staff with the payer's reason.

    EHR write-back

    Related proof of compliant AI delivery

    Read Case Study

    Lera Health: compliant women's health platform

    Not a prior-auth deployment, but it shows how we ship AI healthcare software: privacy-first data, consented PHI flows, human-reviewed outputs — the discipline behind our revenue-cycle agents.

    Lera Health app across desktop and mobile
    Compliance & Guardrails

    Guardrails on every request

    A human owns every payer-facing decision, and every action is reconstructable.

    15-Minute Scoping Call

    PHI handling

    Clinical data stays in HIPAA-ready, encrypted infrastructure under a signed BAA, minimum-necessary per request.

    Human-in-the-loop

    A coordinator approves every packet; the model drafts and matches rules, never transmits on its own.

    Explainability

    Each packet cites the policy criterion and chart evidence behind it, traceable in audit.

    Audit logging

    Every ingest, draft, edit, approval, and 278 transmission is timestamped and attributed.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Yes. PHI stays in HIPAA-ready, encrypted infrastructure under a signed BAA with least-privilege access, audit-logged for Security Rule accountability.

    Ready to automate prior authorization?

    Tell us your top authorization types and payers. We'll return an architecture plan with the review gate, X12 278 / FHIR PAS submission path, and a 2027-ready rollout.

    Email

    contact@agnotic.com

    Partnerships

    contact@agnotic.com