Agnotic Technologies Logo
    Care team reviewing patient risk on a hospital dashboard
    Clinical Intelligence Agent

    Patient Readmission Risk Prediction

    An agent that scores every admission for 30-day readmission risk from the live FHIR record, explains the drivers, and hands the care team a ranked action list.

    Explainable scoringCare-team-in-the-loopFHIR R4Audit Logged

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve

    The manual burden today

    Readmissions are expensive and often preventable, yet the penalty falls on hospitals that can least afford to guess who is at risk. Care managers run a static LACE score by hand — work that doesn't scale and misses social and utilization signals in the record. The agent pulls LACE- and HOSPITAL-style features from FHIR data, runs an ML risk model, and routes ranked high-risk patients to the care team with a calibrated score and its top drivers.

    Architecture

    The risk agent reads FHIR data, computes features, scores with an explainable model, and routes ranked patients to the care-team worklist.

    Readmission risk prediction architecture connected to an EHR

    Key Capabilities

    ML risk scoring grounded in known features, explained per patient.

    15-Minute Scoping Call

    ML risk scoring

    Trains and calibrates a gradient-boosted model on your population for a 30-day readmission probability, revalidated against your own outcomes.

    LACE / HOSPITAL-style features

    Engineers features from length of stay, acuity, comorbidities (Charlson/Elixhauser), prior-year ED visits, discharge labs, and prior utilization.

    Built on FHIR data

    Assembles the feature set from FHIR R4 — Encounter, Condition, Observation, MedicationRequest, Procedure — on live chart data, not a nightly extract.

    Per-patient explanations

    Surfaces the top contributing factors for each score — prior admissions, low discharge hemoglobin, polypharmacy — so the care team sees why.

    Where it runs

    Deployment scenarios

    Discharge planning

    Ranks the inpatient census so case managers focus on the highest-risk patients.

    Heart failure & COPD programs

    Prioritizes condition-specific cohorts known for high readmission.

    Transitional care management

    Triggers TCM outreach — 48-hour calls, med reconciliation — for high-risk discharges.

    Population health

    Feeds risk-stratified cohorts into value-based-care programs and outreach queues.

    Expected impact

    Directional — actual results depend on population, feature availability, and intervention capacity.

    Ranked
    Census stratified by calibrated 30-day risk
    Explained
    Every score ships with its top drivers
    Monitored
    Calibration and drift tracked over time

    Compliance-First Healthcare App Development Services Backed by Global Standards

    15-Minute Scoping Call
    01HIPAA logo

    HIPAA

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

    Protect PHI with privacy-first architecture, encrypted storage and transmission, strict access controls, and traceable audit logs.

    02GDPR logo

    GDPR

    General Data Protection Regulation

    Implement lawful consent flows, data minimization, retention controls, and secure processing for sensitive health data.

    03FHIR logo

    FHIR

    Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources

    Enable standardized health data exchange across apps, care teams, and systems through robust FHIR-ready APIs.

    04HL7 logo

    HL7

    Health Level Seven International

    Support enterprise-grade interoperability with HL7-based integrations for records, events, and clinical messaging workflows.

    05HITRUST logo

    HITRUST

    Health Information Trust Alliance

    Align security programs to healthcare-specific control and risk management practices trusted by providers and ecosystem partners.

    06HITECH logo

    HITECH

    Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

    Design with breach notification readiness, digital record safeguards, and operational controls that support regulated care programs.

    07SaMD logo

    SaMD

    FDA Software as a Medical Device

    Plan software quality, traceability, and documentation pathways for products that may require SaMD review and submission.

    08MDR (EU) logo

    MDR (EU)

    Medical Device Regulation (European Union)

    Prepare EU market-ready processes for risk classification, evidence tracking, and lifecycle governance under MDR expectations.

    09SAMHSA logo

    SAMHSA

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

    Apply confidentiality controls and consent-aware sharing models for behavioral and mental health data experiences.

    Standards we build against

    Standards & interoperability

    FHIRBulk FHIRHIPAASOC 2ICD-10
    How It Works

    From admission to a ranked care-team list

    FHIR data in, explainable score out, ranked patients to the care team, outcome written back for monitoring.

    1.

    Capture — FHIR record

    On admission and at discharge planning, the agent reads Encounter, Condition, Observation, and MedicationRequest from the live FHIR record.

    FHIR R4 features
    2.

    Processing — scoring + guardrails

    Features are computed, the calibrated model scores 30-day risk, and explanations are generated; incomplete cases are flagged, not silently scored.

    Explainable ML
    3.

    Action — rank + route to care team

    High-risk patients are ranked into the care-management worklist with drivers and suggested actions; the care team decides, not the agent.

    Care-team-in-the-loop
    4.

    Write-back — score + outcome

    The score, drivers, and actions are written to the record and logged; observed readmissions feed calibration and drift monitoring.

    Audit logged

    Related proof

    Read Case Study

    Lera Health: compliant women's health platform

    Related proof of compliant, AI-assisted delivery — not this exact agent. Lera Health shows how we turn clinical data into personalized, actionable guidance on a privacy-first data layer.

    Lera Health app across desktop and mobile
    Compliance & Guardrails

    Risk scores you can act on and defend

    A risk model that touches discharge decisions has to be explainable, fair, and audited.

    15-Minute Scoping Call

    PHI handling

    Feature computation and scoring run inside your compliance boundary under a BAA, encrypted throughout, with PHI never used to train external models.

    Care-team-in-the-loop

    The agent scores and ranks; care managers and clinicians decide interventions. No discharge action follows automatically from a score.

    Explainability

    Each score ships with its top contributing features, so the care team validates rather than over-trusts an opaque number.

    Audit logging & fairness

    Scores, drivers, and outcomes are logged immutably, with subgroup calibration monitored so the model doesn't disadvantage a population.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Yes — feature computation, scoring, and training run inside your compliance boundary under a BAA, encrypted throughout, with scores and outcomes audit-logged.

    Ready to stratify your census with confidence?

    Tell us your population and EHR. We'll return an architecture review and a plan to validate a readmission model on your outcomes before it drives decisions.

    Email

    contact@agnotic.com

    Partnerships

    contact@agnotic.com