Vault for one product line
CAD files moved off shared drives into check-in and check-out with versions.

When drawings live on shared drives and changes travel by email, the shop floor builds to whatever file it found last. Agnotic Technologies builds product data management software, or extensions around the PDM you already run, so every part, revision and change has one owner and one record.
Trusted by global innovators
























Product data management software is the system of record for a manufacturer's engineering data: CAD files, part numbers, revisions, bills of materials and engineering changes. Agnotic Technologies builds custom product data management software, or extensions around an existing PDM, so released designs reach ERP and MES with a change record behind every revision.
The symptoms show up in production and purchasing, but the cause is usually upstream in how engineering data is stored and released.
Two engineers open the same assembly from a shared drive, and the second save overwrites the first.
Part numbers come from a spreadsheet, so duplicates appear and nobody knows which one purchasing ordered.
The engineering BOM and the manufacturing BOM in ERP drift apart after a few changes, and kits go to the line short.
A change request lives in an email thread, so nobody can list the drawings and assemblies it touched.
Drawings reach the floor as loose PDFs with no link back to the revision they were printed from.
A supplier keeps building to the old revision because the change notice never reached them.
Most PDM projects stall on this question first. The engineering BOM describes what the product is; the manufacturing BOM describes how the plant builds it. The software has to keep both and the link between them.
| Question | Engineering BOM (EBOM) | Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns it | Design engineering | Manufacturing engineering and planning |
| How it is structured | By function and design assembly, as the CAD model is built | By build sequence, work centre and kit, as the line assembles it |
| What it contains | Designed and purchased parts, with quantities and revisions | The same parts plus consumables, packaging, phantom assemblies and process items |
| When it changes | When an engineering change order releases a new revision | When engineering changes arrive, and when the process changes with no design change |
| Where it lives | PDM, as the system of record for design data | ERP or MES, as the system of record for production |
| How the two stay aligned | Each released revision publishes an item and BOM event | Planners map each EBOM change into the MBOM and record the effectivity |
The answer is usually a mix. We decide per object, not per system, so each record has exactly one home.
If the vault and CAD check-in work, we build what is missing around it through its API: change workflows, ERP release, supplier notices or reporting.
Part numbering schemes, configurable products or a regulated change process that no packaged workflow fits are where a custom build pays off.
CAD files and revisions belong to PDM, the item master and MBOM to ERP, and execution to MES. Integrations move released data; they never let two systems edit the same record.
We build the engineering data layer. CAPA, audits and document control as quality processes are covered on our quality management system software page, and shop floor execution on our MES integration page.
Check-in and check-out with locks, versions on every save, and file references kept so an assembly opens with the right part revisions.
One service issues part numbers to your scheme, checks for duplicates and records who requested each number and why.
Work in progress, in review, released and obsolete states, with revision letters or numbers following the rules your drawings use.
Multi-level BOMs built from the CAD structure, with where-used search so an engineer sees every assembly a part sits in.
The manufacturing BOM built from the released EBOM, with plant-specific items added and every difference traced to its source.
Change request, impact review, change order approval and change notice, each step with its approvers and records.
Released items, BOMs and drawing references published to ERP and MES as events, with acknowledgements stored back in PDM.
A portal or feed that tells each affected supplier about a change and records when they acknowledged it.
This is the release path we design first, because most errors on the floor trace back to it. Nothing moves until a revision is released.
Engineers check files in and out freely. ERP and MES never see unreleased versions.
When the change order is approved, the revision moves to released and its files, BOM and metadata are frozen.
Item, BOM and revision events go onto a queue with the change order number and effectivity date attached.
Planners see the new revision, map it into the MBOM and confirm effectivity, and ERP sends an acknowledgement back.
Work instructions reference the released revision, so the operator sees the drawing that matches the order being built.
We work with the CAD tools your engineers already use and keep neutral formats for exchange and archive.
Our original element for this page: the change flow we build, with the record each step must leave behind. An auditor, a planner or a supplier should be able to answer any question about a change from these records alone.
| Step | What happens | Record it leaves |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Change request (ECR) | Anyone raises a problem or improvement against a part or document | Request with reason, requester, affected items and attachments |
| 2. Impact review | Engineering checks where-used across BOMs, drawings, tooling and stock | Impact list of assemblies, documents, open orders and inventory on hand |
| 3. Change order (ECO) approval | The change board approves, rejects or sends the change back | Approvers, decision, date and any electronic signatures |
| 4. Revision increment | Affected parts and drawings move to the next revision | Old and new revision of each item, with the change order number |
| 5. Effectivity | Planning sets when the change applies: date, serial number or lot | Effectivity rule and the disposition of existing stock |
| 6. Release to ERP and MES | Released data publishes to production systems | Publish events and acknowledgements from each receiving system |
| 7. Change notice (ECN) to suppliers | Each affected supplier is told what changed and from when | Notice sent, supplier acknowledgement and date |
Status views we build into the PDM dashboard.
Changes waiting on review, approval or release, by owner.
Items and documents released, with the change orders behind them.
Released engineering changes not yet mapped into the MBOM.
Change notices a supplier has not yet confirmed.
First releases small enough to prove on one product line.
CAD files moved off shared drives into check-in and check-out with versions.
One source of part numbers, with duplicates found and merged.
ECR to ECO to ECN with approvers and records, around an existing vault.
Released items and BOMs published to ERP instead of retyped.
A light vault, part numbering and change records for a hardware startup heading into its first production run.
Affected suppliers told about each change, with acknowledgements tracked.
PDM owns design data and publishes it; these systems consume it or feed it.
We build secure, scalable products designed for privacy, interoperability, and regulatory readiness from day one across every sector we serve.
Verified controls for security, availability, and confidentiality of enterprise data systems.
Adhering to the international gold standard for managing information security risks.
Ensuring consistent quality in software delivery and operational process optimization.
We combine deep technical expertise with industry-specific knowledge to deliver solutions that aren't just functional, but transformational.
We implement rigorous security protocols and compliance standards (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC2) across all industrial solutions to protect sensitive data.
Our architectures are built to handle massive data loads and user bases, keeping performance steady whether you're serving ten or ten million.
Using our suite of internal tools and proven frameworks, we cut setup work so your first release reaches users sooner.
Beyond simple wrappers, we build deep-learning integrations and predictive analytics directly into the core of your industry-specific workflows.
We start with one product line and one change flow. Effort depends on your files and systems, and we agree a fixed first release on the scoping call.
CAD tools, part numbering, BOM structure, the change process and the systems downstream.
Files, numbers and BOMs sampled, with the duplicates and broken references counted before migration is planned.
The vault or change workflow live for one product line, released data flowing to ERP.
More product lines, MBOM derivation, MES and supplier notices on the same data model.
Fixes, new rules and CAD version upgrades handled under agreed change control.
Short facts we design around, each linked to its primary source. The FDA rules apply to medical device manufacturers.
ASME Y14.35 defines the practices for revising drawings and associated documents and establishes methods for identifying and recording revisions, for any form of original drawing.
Source: ASME Y14.35-2025, Revision of Engineering Product Definition Datasets and Associated DocumentsISO 10303-242:2025 (STEP AP242, edition 4) covers managed model-based 3D engineering, including product data management breakdown structures, configuration control data for product variants, version tracking with the documentation of the change process, and release and approval data.
Source: ISO 10303-242:2025, Part 242: Application protocol: Managed model-based 3D engineeringUnder the FDA Quality Management System Regulation, manufacturers of class II and class III devices, and of class I devices automated with computer software, must comply with the design and development requirements of ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and its subclauses.
Source: 21 CFR 820.10(c) (eCFR)For closed systems, 21 CFR Part 11 requires secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails that record operator entries and actions that create, modify or delete electronic records, without obscuring previously recorded information.
Source: 21 CFR 11.10(e) (eCFR)We don't just build products; we forge lasting partnerships. See how we've helped industry leaders transform their vision into technical reality.

“I can clearly see how Agnotic has a unique way of handling end-to-end development. They are always active on quick chat and provide support quickly.”
Aaron Phelan
Founder, Benchmark

“Agnotic combines deep technical expertise with strong domain knowledge. They understand the business context, anticipate challenges, and make collaboration smooth and effective.”
John Pasmore
Founder, Latimer
“Agnotic is the best technical team we evaluated. Their engineering excellence made our work dramatically easier and allowed us to stay focused on what matters most for maternal care outcomes. They took full ownership of the technical execution, and we are always happy to continue working together.”
Kim Smith
Founder, My Lauren
This page covers engineering data and change control. These pages cover the work next to it.
CAPA, audits and document control as quality processes.
Shop floor execution and the MES and ERP data around it.
Supplier approvals, audits and incoming quality.
Our wider custom build practice for plants and production teams.
Everything we build for manufacturers.
Explore other production-grade engineering platforms we deliver across manufacturing.
The technical patterns behind this platform translate naturally into adjacent verticals.