Maintenance controllers chase paper task cards, airworthiness directive spreadsheets and parts tags that do not match the records. Agnotic Technologies builds aviation maintenance software for airline maintenance departments, MROs and repair stations: record entries, AD tracking, task cards with electronic sign-off and parts traceability. It is ground-side business software, never airborne code.
Trusted by global innovators
Aviation maintenance software is the ground-side system that records maintenance, inspections and airworthiness directive compliance for each aircraft, engine and component, and holds the signed entries that return them to service. Agnotic Technologies builds it for airline maintenance departments, MROs and repair stations, with task cards, electronic sign-off and parts traceability.
The record rules are shared, but each organization signs, plans and hands over records differently. We start from your certificate and your maintenance program.
Carriers running a continuous airworthiness maintenance program across a fleet and several line stations.
Shops maintaining customers' aircraft, engines and components under their own certificate.
Smaller fleets that still need every airworthiness directive and life-limited part tracked to the hour.
Overhaul shops whose records follow each part into someone else's aircraft.
These are the failure points auditors, lessors and buyers of used aircraft find first, so we design against them before anything else.
A recurring airworthiness directive is tracked in a spreadsheet, its interval is entered in hours when the AD states cycles, and the next due date is wrong.
A task card is signed on paper, but the entry in the system lacks the certificate number and kind of certificate of the person who approved the work.
A part is installed from a tag whose serial number does not match the records, so its back-to-birth history breaks at that installation.
Life-limited part status is kept per engine position, not per engine, and does not follow the engine when it moves to another airframe.
After a merger or a lease return, records sit in three systems and nobody can produce a complete AD status when the aircraft is sold.
A deferred defect is closed in the planning tool but never reaches the aircraft's discrepancy list or the next inspection.
Three design decisions, made with your quality and records staff, shape everything else in the system.
Airframe, engines, propellers and appliances each carry their own times, cycles and records, so status moves with the part, not with the position it was in.
Each sign-off stores who signed, their certificate number and kind, exactly what they approved and when, under the electronic signature procedures your organization has in place.
AD number and revision, applicability by model and serial number, method of compliance and recurring interval in the AD's own units are fields, not free text.
The modules we scope when an operator or repair station asks how to build aviation maintenance software that technicians, inspectors and planners use every shift.
The installed parts tree for each tail number, with removals and installations recorded against serial numbers.
Applicability decisions, compliance method, evidence and recurring due dates in hours, cycles or calendar time.
Work packages built from the due list, with task cards that carry the referenced maintenance data and its revision.
Step and final sign-off by the certificated person, with required inspection items routed to an inspector where your program needs them.
Inspection type, extent, total time and the airworthy statement or discrepancy list, created from the completed package.
Receiving, release documents, installation and removal history linked into each part's back-to-birth record.
Deferrals with their limits, linked to the aircraft's discrepancy list and to the work package that clears them.
A complete status pack for a sale, lease return or regulator request, generated from the records rather than assembled by hand.
The path we build for a single task, from the due list to the archived record. Every step writes to the aircraft's history.
The planner builds a work package from the maintenance program, open ADs and deferred defects due for the aircraft.
Each task card goes to the technician's tablet with the referenced maintenance data and its revision.
Steps, measurements and photos are recorded as the work happens; parts are scanned on removal and installation.
Where the program requires it, an inspector signs the required inspection items before the task can close.
The certificated person signs with their certificate number and kind; the signature covers only the work performed.
Times, AD status, life-limited part status and the inspection status update from the closed package.
Work records follow your retention rules, and status records are marked to travel with the aircraft when it is sold.
Picked to fit your fleet, your certificate and the systems you already run. We build on your cloud account and integrate with the tools you choose.
Views we build with your maintenance control and quality teams.
ADs, inspections and life-limited parts by aircraft and by due date.
Task cards open, waiting on parts or waiting on an inspector.
Each deferral with its limit and the package that will clear it.
Entries missing a field, a signature or a traceable part.
First releases we scope, each small enough to ship and check against your records.
Status for each aircraft, rebuilt from existing records and checked line by line.
Electronic task cards and sign-off for one base before rolling out to line stations.
Scanned historical records indexed against the parts tree, with gaps listed.
Customer work orders, return to service records and release paperwork in one place.
Findings from sensor analytics turned into planned tasks with their own records.
A lean records core for a new operator or MRO, built on the same parts model.
The systems a maintenance records platform reads from or writes to, agreed during scoping.
We map each requirement to a field and a signer before any screen is drawn. This is the checklist we walk through with your quality manager.
We build secure, scalable products designed for privacy, interoperability, and regulatory readiness from day one across every sector we serve.
Verified controls for security, availability, and confidentiality of enterprise data systems.
Adhering to the international gold standard for managing information security risks.
Ensuring consistent quality in software delivery and operational process optimization.
We combine deep technical expertise with industry-specific knowledge to deliver solutions that aren't just functional, but transformational.
We implement rigorous security protocols and compliance standards (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC2) across all industrial solutions to protect sensitive data.
Our architectures are built to handle massive data loads and user bases, keeping performance steady whether you're serving ten or ten million.
Using our suite of internal tools and proven frameworks, we cut setup work so your first release reaches users sooner.
Beyond simple wrappers, we build deep-learning integrations and predictive analytics directly into the core of your industry-specific workflows.
Most programs begin with one fleet type or one base. The size of that first release, and its date, are fixed together on the scoping call.
We review your certificate, maintenance program, current record systems and the first fleet or base.
Your quality and records staff fill the requirement checklist with us, field by field and signer by signer.
The parts model, AD tracking and electronic task cards for one fleet type, with the audit trail in place.
Historical records loaded and reconciled against the physical records before the old system is retired.
More fleets, bases and integrations, under change control your quality team approves.
Short facts we design the record fields and sign-off around, each linked to its primary source.
Each person who maintains, rebuilds or alters an aircraft, engine, propeller, appliance or component part must make a maintenance record entry with a description of the work, the date it was completed, the name of the person who performed it and the signature, certificate number and kind of certificate of the person approving it.
Source: 14 CFR 43.9(a) (eCFR)After an inspection under part 91, the person approving or disapproving return to service must record the type and extent of the inspection, the date and aircraft total time in service, and their signature, certificate number and kind of certificate.
Source: 14 CFR 43.11(a) (eCFR)An owner or operator must keep the current status of applicable airworthiness directives, including the method of compliance, the AD number and revision date and, for a recurring AD, the time and date when the next action is required.
Source: 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v) (eCFR)Records of individual maintenance and inspections are kept until the work is repeated or superseded or for one year, while status records such as total time in service, life-limited part status and AD status are retained and transferred with the aircraft when it is sold.
Source: 14 CFR 91.417(b) (eCFR)Anyone who operates a product that does not meet the requirements of an applicable airworthiness directive is in violation of 14 CFR 39.7.
Source: 14 CFR 39.7 (eCFR)We don't just build products; we forge lasting partnerships. See how we've helped industry leaders transform their vision into technical reality.
“I can clearly see how Agnotic has a unique way of handling end-to-end development. They are always active on quick chat and provide support quickly.”
Aaron Phelan
Founder, Benchmark
“Agnotic combines deep technical expertise with strong domain knowledge. They understand the business context, anticipate challenges, and make collaboration smooth and effective.”
John Pasmore
Founder, Latimer
“Agnotic is the best technical team we evaluated. Their engineering excellence made our work dramatically easier and allowed us to stay focused on what matters most for maternal care outcomes. They took full ownership of the technical execution, and we are always happy to continue working together.”
Kim Smith
Founder, My Lauren
This page covers maintenance records and sign-off. These pages cover the data and operations around them.
Sensor data and failure prediction that feed planned maintenance tasks.
Maintenance management for plants and facilities, built on the same work order patterns.
Stock, reorder and traceability for spare parts.
The record that ties a task to its labor, parts and sign-off.
All the aerospace software we build.
Explore other production-grade engineering platforms we deliver across aerospace & defense.
