Organization and accounts
- Separate accounts or subscriptions for production, staging and shared services
- Organization-level policies that block risky actions
- Billing and tagging rules applied from day one

Your cloud bill, account sprawl or a looming migration needs decisions before more gets built on top. Agnotic Technologies gives you the architecture, landing zone, cost model and migration plan as written outputs your team can act on.
Trusted by global innovators
























Cloud consulting is advisory and architecture work that decides how your software should run in the cloud before and while it is built: choosing between AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, designing the landing zone, reviewing architecture against the Well-Architected pillars, setting the security baseline and planning migrations and costs. Agnotic Technologies provides it as a services engagement.
It is different from cloud DevOps, which builds and runs the pipelines and infrastructure, and from cloud migration, which moves existing systems. Consulting produces the decisions and designs those teams carry out; the related pages cover both.
You get written outputs you can act on: an architecture decision record, a landing zone design, a cost model and a migration plan, not a slide deck.
Six kinds of work, each with a written output.
A written comparison of AWS, Azure and Google Cloud for your workload, data residency, existing skills and partner credits.
Accounts or subscriptions, identity, networking, logging and guardrails laid out before the first workload lands.
A review of an existing architecture against the six pillars, with a ranked list of changes.
A cost model for the target architecture, tagging and budgets, and the reserved or spot decisions that cut the bill.
Identity, encryption, logging and network controls, mapped to the rules your customers will ask about.
Which systems to rehost, replatform, refactor or retire, in what order, and how to cut over.
Reference design
The layers we design before any workload is deployed. Each layer is a set of written decisions, infrastructure as code and a named owner.
Decision table
Five fixed-scope engagements. Each one ends with written outputs and a named next step.
| Engagement | You need it when | What you receive | What usually follows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider selection | You are starting a new product or renegotiating with a provider | A written comparison and recommendation with cost and residency notes | Landing zone design |
| Landing zone design | Your first workload is about to be deployed, or accounts grew without a plan | Account structure, identity, network and logging design as infrastructure as code | Cloud DevOps to run it |
| Well-Architected review | An existing system has outages, surprise bills or a security questionnaire to answer | A ranked list of findings and changes across the six pillars | A remediation sprint |
| Cost and FinOps review | The bill grew faster than usage | A cost model, tagging rules, budgets and a list of savings with owners | Monthly cost reviews |
| Migration plan | You are leaving a data center or another cloud | An inventory, a strategy per system (the 7 Rs) and a cutover plan | Cloud migration and modernization |
A review often turns into a landing zone redesign when the account structure is the root cause of the findings.
Related services
Consulting produces the decisions. These services carry them out.
Pipelines, infrastructure as code, monitoring and on-call for the landing zone we designed.
Moving existing systems to the target architecture, one workload at a time.
CI/CD, environments and observability for product teams.
Warehouses, pipelines and reporting on the cloud data platform.
Failure points
The patterns we find in most reviews, and the design decision that fixes each.
Challenge
Accounts and permissions grew by hand, so nobody can say who has access to production.
Agnotic approach
A landing zone with single sign-on, least-privilege roles and no long-lived keys, defined as code.
Challenge
The bill grew faster than usage and nobody owns it.
Agnotic approach
Tagging, budgets and a monthly cost review with named owners, plus reserved capacity where usage is steady.
Challenge
A migration started with the hardest system and stalled.
Agnotic approach
An inventory with a strategy per system and a sequence that starts with low-risk workloads.
Challenge
Security questions from a customer could not be answered.
Agnotic approach
A written security baseline mapped to the controls customers ask about, with evidence from logs and configuration.
Challenge
The architecture was lifted from a vendor diagram, not from the workload.
Agnotic approach
A Well-Architected review that starts from your traffic, data and team, and records each decision.
Four steps from scoping call to handover or build.
We learn the workloads, the team, the current bill and the deadline, and agree which engagement from the table fits.
ScopeWe read the current architecture, accounts, costs and incidents, and interview the engineers who run them.
DiscoverWe produce the landing zone design, review findings or migration plan as written decisions and infrastructure as code.
DesignYour team carries out the plan with our support, or our cloud DevOps and migration teams carry it out with you.
DeliverHealthcare workloads
For healthcare clients the baseline adds HIPAA engineering decisions. Agnotic claims no certification; these are the controls we design in.
Scope and cost
We do not publish prices. These drivers decide the size of an engagement.
Each system reviewed or migrated adds discovery and design time.
Accounts built by hand without infrastructure as code take longer to understand and reshape.
A multi-cloud or hybrid estate needs a design per provider and a shared identity layer.
Health, financial or government data adds control mapping and evidence work.
A review for a team that will run the result needs more workshops and documentation than a build we also deliver.
Who we work with
Four situations that bring teams to us.
A landing zone and cost model before the product has customers.
A FinOps review and a Well-Architected review with ranked changes.
A migration plan with a strategy per system and a cutover sequence.
A security baseline that can pass a customer security review.
Frameworks
Each provider's own framework, plus the NIST references that define the terms.
Definitions and frameworks we design against, each linked to its primary source.
NIST SP 800-145 defines cloud computing through five essential characteristics, three service models and four deployment models.
Source: NIST SP 800-145, The NIST Definition of Cloud ComputingThe AWS Well-Architected Framework is organized into six pillars: operational excellence, security, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization and sustainability.
Source: AWS Well-Architected Framework documentationAWS Prescriptive Guidance names seven migration strategies, the 7 Rs: retire, retain, rehost, relocate, repurchase, replatform, and refactor or re-architect.
Source: AWS Prescriptive Guidance, migration strategiesNIST SP 800-218, the Secure Software Development Framework, groups secure development practices into four areas: prepare the organization, protect the software, produce well-secured software and respond to vulnerabilities.
Source: NIST SP 800-218 (SSDF)HIPAA defines a business associate as a vendor that creates, receives, maintains or transmits protected health information for a covered entity, so a cloud service that maintains ePHI falls inside the definition.
Source: 45 CFR 160.103 (eCFR)