Real-Time Data Warehouse

    Real-time data warehouse and streaming services

    Nightly batch loads suit finance reports and are too slow for stock positions or fraud signals. Agnotic Technologies builds real-time data pipelines that capture changes from your operational databases, stream them into warehouse tables continuously, and keep each use case on the latency tier it really needs.

    Latency tier per use caseLog-based change data captureExactly-once where it mattersOperational analytics and reverse ETL

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve

    Real-time data

    What is a real-time data warehouse?

    A real-time data warehouse is an analytics store that receives changes from operational systems continuously instead of in nightly batches, so dashboards and applications query data that is seconds or minutes old. Agnotic Technologies builds the change data capture, streaming, processing and table layers behind it, and decides with you what actually needs real time.

    Real time costs more to run than batch, because the pipeline never stops. We keep batch wherever a daily refresh is enough and stream only where a decision depends on fresh data.

    Our data engineering service covers batch pipelines and warehouse design, and plant floor sensor data has its own industrial IoT platform page. This page is about business databases and business events.

    Decision table

    Which use cases need real time, and which pattern fits?

    We fill this in for each use case before choosing any technology.

    Use caseLatency tierPatternWhy
    Month-end finance reportingBatch, dailyScheduled extract and load, then transformsFigures are reconciled and signed off; fresher data adds cost, not value
    Inventory position across stores or warehousesMicro-batch, every few minutesCDC into a lakehouse table with frequent mergesStock decisions need recent counts, not every single event
    Fraud or abuse signalStreaming, seconds or lessStream processing on events, with rules or a model scoring each oneThe decision must happen before the transaction completes
    Operations dashboard for a shift or a fleetStreaming into a real-time OLAP storeCDC and events into tables built for fast aggregate queriesPeople act on what they see during the shift
    Machine learning featuresMixed: streaming for fresh features, batch for historyOne feature definition computed in the stream and backfilled in batchTraining and serving must see the same feature logic
    Customer insights pushed to CRM or support toolsMicro-batch reverse ETLWarehouse models synced to operational tools on changeSales and support act on warehouse insights inside their own tools

    Ask what decision changes if the data is an hour old. If none does, batch is the cheaper answer.

    Reference pipeline

    How does a database change reach a warehouse table?

    The five layers we build, from the source database's log to the tool where someone acts on the data.

    01

    Capture

    • Log-based CDC from PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server or Oracle
    • Debezium or a managed CDC service
    • Initial snapshot, then ongoing changes
    02

    Stream

    • Apache Kafka or a managed equivalent
    • Schema registry with compatibility rules
    • Topics per table or per business event
    03

    Process

    • Apache Flink or Spark Structured Streaming
    • Event time windows and watermarks
    • Deduplication and late data rules
    • Checkpoints for recovery
    04

    Store

    • Apache Iceberg or Delta Lake tables with upserts
    • A real-time OLAP store for dashboards
    • Compaction and snapshot expiry jobs
    05

    Serve and act

    • BI and operational dashboards
    • Reverse ETL to CRM, support and marketing tools
    • Alerts and application APIs

    Low latency serving

    How do you serve fresh data to an application in milliseconds?

    Low latency applications get fresh data through a serving pattern chosen per query: a precomputed key-value lookup in a cache, a real-time OLAP store for aggregates, a search index for text and filters, or a direct warehouse query where a slower answer is fine. Agnotic Technologies picks the pattern from the query and the freshness it needs.

    Serving patternFreshnessQuery it suitsFailure point
    Precomputed key-value lookup in a cacheAs fresh as the stream job that writes itOne record by key: a balance, a stock level or a model featureCache and source drift apart when an update event is lost, so keys need expiry and a rebuild path
    Real-time OLAP storeShortly after each event is ingestedAggregates over recent events, with filters and group-byLarge joins at query time slow it down, so data is joined before it is loaded
    Search indexAfter each index refreshFree text, facets and filters across many fieldsA mapping change needs a full reindex, so index aliases allow a swap without downtime
    Direct warehouse queryAs fresh as the last merge into the tableRare or ad hoc queries and internal toolsConcurrency limits queue requests, so it never sits behind a public endpoint without a cache

    Before choosing tools we set a latency budget per hop: ingest, process, store, query and the network back to the user each get a share, and load tests measure each share on its own. Caching and load testing are covered on our Redis development and performance testing pages.

    Failure points

    Where do streaming pipelines go wrong?

    Problems we design against from the first pipeline.

    Challenge

    A source team renames a column and the pipeline breaks overnight.

    Agnotic approach

    Schemas are registered with compatibility rules, so a breaking change is rejected at the producer instead of found downstream.

    Challenge

    Totals double after a restart.

    Agnotic approach

    Processing is transactional or idempotent end to end, and sinks upsert on a key, so replays never double count.

    Challenge

    Late events land in the wrong window or vanish.

    Agnotic approach

    Windows use event time with watermarks and an allowed lateness, and late events update results instead of being dropped.

    Challenge

    Thousands of small files make queries slow.

    Agnotic approach

    Compaction runs on a schedule, and merge frequency follows the use case's latency tier.

    Challenge

    Deletes in the source never reach the warehouse.

    Agnotic approach

    CDC captures deletes, and the table format applies them as row-level deletes.

    Challenge

    The CDC connector falls behind and the source log fills its disk.

    Agnotic approach

    Replication lag and retained log size are monitored, with alerts well before the source is at risk.

    What do we build for real-time and operational analytics?

    The components of a real-time data warehouse, built and handed over with runbooks.

    CDC connectors

    Log-based capture from your operational databases, with snapshots, permissions and log retention set up with your DBAs.

    Streaming backbone

    Kafka or a managed equivalent, with topics, retention, access control and a schema registry.

    Stream processing jobs

    Joins, windows, deduplication and enrichment in Flink or Spark, with checkpoints and replay.

    Real-time tables

    Upserting lakehouse tables and real-time OLAP stores, with compaction and retention jobs.

    Data contracts

    Schemas, owners and compatibility rules agreed with source teams and checked in CI.

    Reverse ETL

    Warehouse models pushed back to CRM, support and marketing tools, so operational analytics reaches the people who act on it.

    Running cost

    How do we keep always-on pipelines affordable?

    Streaming is billed every hour of the day, so cost control is part of the design.

    • Batch stays batch wherever a daily or hourly refresh meets the need
    • Micro-batch merges instead of per-event writes where minutes are fine
    • Topic and snapshot retention set by what is actually replayed
    • Compute sized to the stream's real volume, with autoscaling on managed services
    • Each pipeline tagged to the use case that pays for it, so cost is visible
    • Unused topics, jobs and tables found and retired at a regular review

    Who it is for

    Which teams need real-time data?

    Teams whose decisions depend on what happened minutes ago, not yesterday.

    Retail and ecommerce operations

    Inventory, order status and fulfilment views that follow the business during the day.

    Fintech and payments

    Fraud, risk and limit signals evaluated while a transaction is still open.

    Logistics and field operations

    Fleet, job and exception dashboards for dispatchers and shift leads.

    SaaS companies

    In-product analytics that show customers their own fresh data.

    Sales, support and success teams

    Warehouse insights synced into the tools they already use through reverse ETL.

    Technologies

    Which technologies do we build streaming pipelines on?

    Open source projects and their managed equivalents on your cloud.

    Apache KafkaDebeziumApache FlinkApache IcebergDelta LakeSpark Structured Streaming
    Facts and sources

    What do the Kafka, Debezium, Flink and Iceberg docs say?

    Project documentation behind the patterns on this page, each linked to its primary source.

    • Debezium describes log-based change data capture as capturing all data changes with very low delay, while avoiding the extra CPU load that frequent polling puts on the source database.

      Source: Debezium documentation: features
    • Apache Kafka guarantees at-least-once delivery by default; exactly-once delivery is available within Kafka through the transactional producer and read-committed consumers, while exactly-once delivery to other systems generally needs their cooperation.

      Source: Apache Kafka documentation: design
    • Apache Flink documentation explains that some events arrive after the watermark has passed their timestamp, so streaming programs must expect late elements, and holding watermarks back too long delays window results.

      Source: Apache Flink documentation: timely stream processing
    • Version 2 of the Apache Iceberg table spec adds row-level updates and deletes, using delete files so individual rows can be changed without rewriting the immutable data files.

      Source: Apache Iceberg table spec

    Scope and cost

    What drives the cost of a real-time data warehouse?

    Build cost and running cost depend on the same factors, so we estimate both together on the scoping call.

    Source systems

    How many databases and event sources feed the pipeline, and which engines they run.

    Change volume

    How many changes per day each source produces, which sizes the stream and its storage.

    Latency tiers

    How many use cases need streaming rather than micro-batch or batch.

    Transformations

    Joins, enrichment and business rules applied in the stream.

    Destinations

    Warehouses, OLAP stores and operational tools the data must reach.

    Operations

    Whether your team or ours runs the pipelines after launch.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    We do not publish prices. Cost depends on the number of sources, change volume, how many use cases need streaming, the transformations and the destinations. Running cost depends on the same factors, so we estimate both on the scoping call.