Idle steel roll processing line during a planned shutdown, with red lockout padlocks and tags on an isolation panel and a tool trolley holding a tablet
    Manufacturing / Shutdown Maintenance Planning

    AI shutdown maintenance planning for manufacturing plants

    Plants that run around the clock get a short shutdown window each month and a backlog far longer than the crew can clear. Agnotic Technologies builds shutdown maintenance planning software that scores every pending job, reads shift logbooks and technician photos, and proposes a plan that fits the window.

    One list
    Plan, breakdowns and logbook together
    One score
    The same rule for every job
    SAP PM
    Planned jobs become work orders

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Industry Overview

    What is shutdown maintenance planning software?

    Shutdown maintenance planning software gathers every pending job, logbook abnormality and breakdown record into one list, scores each job on criticality, safety and failure risk, and proposes which jobs fit the next shutdown window and crew. Agnotic Technologies builds it in front of SAP PM, so the planner approves the plan and the jobs become work orders.

    Who it is for

    Who plans the shutdown, and what does each person need?

    One shutdown plan serves several people. Each one needs a different view of the same job list.

    Maintenance heads and planners

    Need to pick the jobs that matter most for the window, and to explain why others were deferred.

    Reliability and condition monitoring engineers

    Want vibration, temperature and breakdown history to count when jobs are ranked.

    Shift supervisors and technicians

    Record abnormalities during the shift and need them to reach the plan without retyping.

    Plant and operations heads

    Need to see the risk carried by every deferred job before the line restarts.

    Contractor coordinators

    Size contractor manpower to the jobs that fit, and brief outside crews on isolation steps.

    Industry Challenges

    Why does shutdown planning still depend on one person?

    Most plants have the data. It is spread across sheets, a book and a chat group.

    • The maintenance plan, the breakdown record and the shutdown record sit in separate Excel sheets.

    • Abnormalities are written in a hard copy logbook on the shop floor, one page per shift.

    • Technicians share photos and videos of a fault in a chat group, and the planner walks back to the equipment to understand it.

    • Priority codes say how fast to act, not how much a job matters, so supervisors mark their own jobs as top priority.

    • The plan is built from one senior engineer's experience, and nobody else knows why a job was deferred.

    • A job that should have been done during the shutdown slips through and comes back as a breakdown.

    Job scoring

    How should each shutdown job be scored?

    The scoring rule we start from. The weights are agreed with your maintenance head; the rule that every job is scored the same way does not change.

    Shutdown job scoring factors with what each measures, where the data comes from and how it moves the score
    FactorWhat it measuresWhere the data comes fromHow it moves the score
    Equipment criticalityHow much the plant depends on the assetCriticality ranking on the equipment master or functional locationCritical assets start higher
    Safety and environmental riskHarm if the job is not doneAbnormality notes, inspection findings and the job's isolation needsAny open safety risk lifts the job to the top band
    Condition marginHow close readings are to their limitsVibration, temperature, current and oil readings from condition monitoringReadings near the limit raise the score; a rising trend raises it more
    Failure probabilityLikelihood of failure in the next 30 daysBreakdown records and condition history for the assetAdded where there is enough history; left out where there is not
    Deferral countHow many shutdowns the job has already missedThe plan's own record of past shutdownsEach deferral adds weight, so no job disappears
    Line stop impactWhether a failure would stop productionProcess flow and redundancy for the assetSingle points of failure score higher
    Our Approach

    How does Agnotic approach shutdown maintenance planning?

    Three decisions shape the build. We make them with your planners before writing any code.

    One list before planning starts

    Plan items, logbook abnormalities, breakdown follow-ups and inspection findings land in one register, so nothing waits in a separate sheet or book.

    One scoring rule everyone can see

    AI maintenance job prioritization works only if people trust it, so the score shows its factors and the planner can see why one job ranks above another.

    Software proposes, the planner decides

    The system suggests a plan that fits the window and the crew. The planner adjusts it, and every change and deferral is recorded with a reason.

    Capabilities

    What do we build for shutdown maintenance planning?

    Modules that follow one abnormality from the shop floor to a closed work order.

    Digital shift checklists

    Fixed fields for equipment, parameter, reading and observation on a tablet, working offline on the shop floor and syncing when back in range.

    Maintenance logbook digitization

    Crews who prefer paper photograph the logbook page, and an AI model reads it into rows that a supervisor checks before they join the list.

    Photo and video fault reports

    Photos and short videos attach to the abnormality itself. Vision models suggest the likely issue, such as a leak, misalignment or abnormal wear, for the planner to confirm.

    Job scoring

    Every job scored on criticality, safety, condition margin, failure probability, deferrals and line stop impact, with the factors shown next to the score.

    Failure probability

    Models trained on your breakdown records and condition data estimate which assets are most likely to fail in the next 30 days.

    Shutdown plan builder

    Fits the highest-scoring jobs to the window, the permanent crew and the contractor manpower available, and shows what is deferred and the risk it carries.

    Job packs with isolation steps

    Each planned job carries its lockout or tagout steps, permits, parts and tools, so crews and contractors start with the same brief.

    Shutdown close-out

    What was done, what was found and what was deferred is recorded after every shutdown, and deferred jobs carry their score into next month.

    How It Works

    How does one abnormality become a shutdown job?

    The planning workflow we build. Scoring is one step in it, not the whole system.

    Record

    A shift crew logs an abnormality on the checklist, or photographs the logbook page, with a photo or video of the equipment.

    1

    Describe

    Vision and language models suggest what the fault is likely to be and which asset it belongs to; a supervisor confirms.

    2

    Score

    The job is scored on the agreed factors and joins the register beside plan items and breakdown follow-ups.

    3

    Fit

    Before the shutdown, the plan builder proposes the jobs that fit the hours, crew and contractors; the planner adjusts and approves.

    4

    Execute

    Approved jobs go to SAP PM as work orders with their job packs, isolation steps and parts.

    5

    Close

    Completion and findings come back from SAP PM, and deferred jobs carry their score and a higher deferral weight into the next plan.

    6
    Engineering Stack

    How does it work with SAP PM and condition monitoring?

    Maintenance work order prioritization software should sit in front of the system of record, not replace it. Clean, ranked jobs flow into SAP PM, and completion data flows back.

    SAP PM

    Equipment and functional locationsMaintenance notificationsMaintenance ordersOrder confirmations and history

    Condition data

    Vibration monitoringTemperature and thermal readingsMotor currentOil analysis results

    Shop floor capture

    Tablet checklists that work offlinePhone photos and short videosPhotographed logbook pagesExcel import of the current plan

    Platform

    Role-based access by plant and lineAudit log of every score change and deferralModel monitoring and retrainingAWS, Microsoft Azure or on premises
    Measured Impact

    What should a shutdown planning program measure?

    Measures that show whether the plan is choosing the right jobs, not just more jobs.

    Planned jobs done
    Completed in the window

    Jobs finished against jobs planned, by shutdown.

    High-score deferrals
    Top jobs left out

    How many top-band jobs were deferred, and why.

    Breakdowns after deferral
    Deferred jobs that failed

    Shows whether the scoring rule needs new weights.

    Planning effort
    Time to build the plan

    Hours from backlog to an approved shutdown plan.

    Use Cases

    Where do plants usually start?

    First releases scoped to one line or one step of the workflow.

    01

    Score the current backlog

    Import the Excel plan and breakdown record, and score every open job the same way.

    02

    Digitize the shift logbook

    Checklists or logbook photos turned into one list of open abnormalities.

    03

    Photo-based fault capture

    Technicians attach photos and videos to faults instead of posting them to a chat group.

    04

    Failure prediction for rotating equipment

    Motors, pumps, fans and gearboxes with vibration and breakdown history.

    05

    Contractor manpower planning

    Matching contractor crews to the jobs that fit the window.

    06

    One line, one shutdown

    The full workflow run on one line beside the current plan before it goes wider.

    Integrations

    Which systems does shutdown planning connect to?

    Where jobs come from and where planned jobs go.

    Notifications and work orders

    SAP PM

    Work orders

    Other CMMS and EAM systems

    Vibration and temperature

    Condition monitoring systems

    Process parameters

    Plant historian and SCADA

    Import

    Excel plans and records

    Parts reservation

    Spare parts inventory
    What we check

    What should be ready before the shutdown starts?

    The readiness checks the plan builder runs for each shutdown. A job that fails a check is flagged, not silently dropped.

    Job list

    • Every open abnormality and breakdown follow-up is in the register
    • Each job has a score and its factors are visible
    • Deferred jobs from the last shutdown are carried forward

    Safety and isolation

    • Each job has its lockout or tagout steps attached
    • Group lockout is planned where a crew shares a machine
    • Contractors have received the plant's isolation procedures

    Crew and contractors

    • Permanent crew hours are matched to the planned jobs
    • Contractor manpower is booked for the jobs that need it
    • Shift handover of locks and tags is planned

    Parts and tools

    • Spare parts are reserved for every planned job
    • Special tools and lifting equipment are booked
    • Jobs waiting on parts are flagged before the window opens

    Compliance-First Development Services Backed by Global Standards

    We build secure, scalable products designed for privacy, interoperability, and regulatory readiness from day one across every sector we serve.

    ISO 27001 logo

    Information Security Management

    Adhering to the international gold standard for managing information security risks.

    ISO 9001 logo

    Quality Management Systems

    Ensuring consistent quality in software delivery and operational process optimization.

    Our Edge

    Why Global Leaders Choose Us

    We combine deep technical expertise with industry-specific knowledge to deliver solutions that aren't just functional, but transformational.

    Enterprise-Grade Security

    We implement rigorous security protocols and compliance standards (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC2) across all industrial solutions to protect sensitive data.

    High-Performance Scaling

    Our architectures are built to handle massive data loads and user bases, keeping performance steady whether you're serving ten or ten million.

    Accelerated Time-to-Market

    Using our suite of internal tools and proven frameworks, we cut setup work so your first release reaches users sooner.

    Embedded AI Integration

    Beyond simple wrappers, we build deep-learning integrations and predictive analytics directly into the core of your industry-specific workflows.

    Engagement Model

    How does a shutdown planning engagement run?

    We start with your own backlog. It depends on scope; we agree a fixed first release on the scoping call.

    01

    Scoping call

    We review how the shutdown plan is built today, the records it draws on and how SAP PM is rolled out in your plant.

    02

    Score your backlog with you

    Your planners and our engineers score a real backlog together, which fixes the factors and their weights.

    03

    Fixed-scope first release

    The register, scoring, shift capture and plan builder for one line, with work orders going to SAP PM.

    04

    Run beside the current plan

    The software proposes a plan for a real shutdown while the planner still builds one the usual way, so the two can be compared.

    05

    Extend

    More lines, failure prediction and photo analysis, retrained from what each shutdown found.

    Facts and sources

    Which rules shape shutdown maintenance work?

    Shutdown jobs are servicing work on isolated equipment, so the US lockout/tagout rule shapes the job packs and the crew plan. Your local rules may add more.

    • OSHA's lockout/tagout standard requires employers to develop, document and use procedures for controlling hazardous energy whenever employees service or maintain machines or equipment.

      Source: 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4), OSHA (eCFR)
    • When servicing or maintenance is performed by a crew, craft, department or other group, OSHA requires a group lockout or tagout procedure that gives each worker protection equivalent to a personal lockout or tagout device.

      Source: 29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3), OSHA (eCFR)
    • When outside servicing personnel such as contractors work on equipment, OSHA requires the on-site employer and the outside employer to inform each other of their lockout or tagout procedures.

      Source: 29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2), OSHA (eCFR)
    • OSHA requires specific procedures during shift or personnel changes so that lockout or tagout protection is transferred in an orderly way between off-going and oncoming employees.

      Source: 29 CFR 1910.147(f)(4), OSHA (eCFR)

    Voice of success

    We don't just build products; we forge lasting partnerships. See how we've helped industry leaders transform their vision into technical reality.

    Benchmark

    “I can clearly see how Agnotic has a unique way of handling end-to-end development. They are always active on quick chat and provide support quickly.”

    Aaron Phelan

    Aaron Phelan

    Founder, Benchmark

    Related pages

    Related maintenance and plant software

    This page covers choosing and planning shutdown jobs. These pages cover the systems around it.

    Condition monitoring software

    Vibration, temperature and other machine readings checked against alarm limits, with confirmed alarms sent to maintenance.

    SAP PM integration services

    Notifications, maintenance orders and measurement readings exchanged with SAP PM as it rolls out line by line.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Put every pending job in one list, then score each one on the same factors: equipment criticality, safety risk, how close condition readings are to their limits, failure history, how many shutdowns it has missed and whether a failure would stop the line. Fit the highest scores to the hours and crew you have, and carry deferred jobs forward with extra weight.