Care management programs promise fewer hospital visits, better control of chronic conditions and steadier revenue from monthly care management codes. Many programs fall short of that promise. Enrollment stalls, care plans are written once and never updated, care managers spend their days chasing information, and leaders cannot tell whether the program changes outcomes.
This guide looks at the most common care management challenges and practical fixes for each: enrollment and consent, patient disengagement, stale care plans, fragmented data, missed transitions of care, staffing and caseloads, time tracking and billing, and measuring results. It draws on CMS requirements for chronic care management (CCM) where they shape the problem.
What are the biggest care management challenges?
Building or fixing a care management platform?
Agnotic builds care management software with enrollment, care plans, task queues, time tracking and EHR integration.
The biggest care management challenges are enrolling eligible patients and documenting consent, keeping patients engaged, keeping care plans current, getting data from hospitals and other providers, catching transitions of care, managing caseloads, tracking time for billing and proving outcomes. Most of them come down to information arriving late, in the wrong place or not at all.
These problems feed each other. When care managers spend hours gathering records, they have less time for patients; when patients disengage, enrollment numbers mislead; and when time tracking is manual, billing undercounts the work. Fixing one challenge in isolation rarely holds.
Why is enrollment and consent so hard?
Enrollment and consent are hard because eligible patients must be found, contacted and enrolled with specific information covered. CMS's CCM booklet explains that practitioners must get and document the patient's verbal or written consent, and inform the patient about the availability of the service, any cost sharing, that only one practitioner can bill CCM per calendar month and the right to stop at any time, effective at the end of the month.
- Finding patients: Lists of patients with two or more chronic conditions often include people who already receive care management elsewhere.
- Reaching them: Phone outreach at scale is slow and many patients do not answer unknown numbers.
- Explaining cost sharing: Patients hesitate when they hear about a monthly charge, especially without a clear explanation of what they receive.
- Documenting consent: Consent recorded in free text cannot be checked or reported.
Fixes include eligibility lists that remove patients already enrolled elsewhere where that is known, outreach scripts tested with patients, outreach by the patient's own practice rather than an unfamiliar number, and structured consent records with the required elements as checkboxes, a date and the staff member.
The CMS booklet notes that consent is needed only once unless the billing practitioner changes. Track that event, since a new practitioner means new consent, and many programs miss it when a patient switches primary care providers within the same group.
Why do patients disengage after enrolling?
Patients disengage after enrolling when monthly contact feels like a checklist call rather than help. If every call asks the same questions without changing anything, patients stop answering, and the program keeps billing time for attempts that do not reach anyone.
Engagement improves when each contact is tied to the patient's goals and to something concrete: a medication question answered, an appointment arranged, a ride booked or a benefit applied for. Care plans should state goals in the patient's words, and contact notes should record progress against them.
Offer channels beyond phone calls. Secure messages, texts and short video calls suit many patients better, and the program should record which channel each patient prefers and use it.
Caregivers matter too. Many patients in care management rely on a spouse or adult child to manage appointments and medications, and contacting only the patient misses the person who actually acts. Record caregivers with the patient's permission, note what they may be told, and include them in contacts when the patient agrees.
Why do care plans fall out of date?
Care plans fall out of date because they are often written once at enrollment and stored as a document. CMS requires a comprehensive care plan for CCM, available electronically and shared with the patient and other practitioners as appropriate, but a document that no one edits soon stops reflecting the patient's situation.
A working care plan should be structured: problems, goals, interventions, responsible people and target dates, each with status. Contacts should update the relevant items directly, and changes such as a hospital stay or new diagnosis should prompt a plan review.
Sharing is the other gap. Specialists, home health agencies and caregivers often never see the plan. Exporting it in a readable format, and where possible as structured FHIR CarePlan data, helps others act on it.
How does fragmented data hold care managers back?
Fragmented data holds care managers back because the information they need sits in many systems: the practice EHR, hospital records, pharmacy fills, lab results, payer claims and remote monitoring devices. Without integration, care managers spend much of their day logging in, faxing and calling to assemble a picture.
- Hospital events: Admission, discharge and transfer notifications from hospitals and health information exchanges.
- Medication data: Fill history to spot missed refills and duplicate therapies.
- Results: Lab values and vitals relevant to each condition, including remote monitoring readings.
- Claims: Payer data showing visits and services outside the practice.
- Social needs: Screening results and referrals to community services.
The aim is not to show everything. Care managers need a short worklist of what changed and what needs action, with the source available when they want detail.
Start integration where the effort pays back fastest. Hospital event notifications usually come first because they drive the most urgent work, followed by medication fill data and then claims. Each new source should replace a manual task that care managers already do, so the benefit is visible and staff trust the feed enough to stop checking the old way.
Why are transitions of care so often missed?
Transitions of care are often missed because the practice does not learn about a hospital admission or emergency visit until days later, or at all. The period after discharge is when medication errors and readmissions are most likely, so late notice wastes the program's most valuable window.
Admission and discharge notifications, from hospitals directly or through health information exchanges, should create tasks automatically: contact the patient within a set time, reconcile medications, confirm follow-up appointments and update the care plan. Track how quickly each task is completed.
Discharge summaries are the next gap. When they arrive as faxes or never arrive, care managers lack the detail to reconcile medications. Requesting them electronically and filing them against the transition task closes that loop.
How do staffing and caseloads limit programs?
Staffing and caseloads limit programs because care managers can only handle so many patients well, and high-need patients take far more time than stable ones. Programs that assign patients evenly by count overload some staff while others have capacity.
Stratify patients by need and set contact frequency by tier. Use non-clinical staff for scheduling, outreach and resource referrals so nurses and social workers spend time on clinical work. Software should show each care manager's caseload by tier and overdue tasks, so supervisors can rebalance before patients fall through.
Coverage after hours is part of staffing. The CCM booklet requires 24/7 access to practitioners or clinical staff with access to the patient's electronic care plan for urgent needs. Programs often meet this through an on-call arrangement or partner, and the after-hours team needs the same care plan view as daytime staff.
What makes time tracking and billing difficult?
Time tracking and billing are difficult because care management codes depend on clinical staff time per calendar month, spread across many short calls, messages and coordination tasks. Manual timesheets miss time and are hard to audit.
- Automatic timers: Time captured on calls, messages and documentation, with staff able to correct it.
- Monthly totals: Running totals per patient against code thresholds, visible to care managers.
- Duplicate checks: Flags when another practitioner may be billing care management for the same month.
- Audit records: Who did what, when and for how long, linked to the care plan.
Avoid letting thresholds drive care. The aim of tracking is to bill accurately for the work patients need, not to add calls at the end of the month to reach a time requirement.
Billing rules also vary across codes and payers. Chronic, principal and complex care management, transitional care and remote monitoring each have their own requirements, and some combinations cannot be billed for the same patient in the same period. Keep these rules in a maintained table rather than in staff memory, and review it each January when the fee schedule changes.
How should programs measure whether care management works?
Programs should measure whether care management works using outcomes that matter to patients and payers, compared with similar patients who were not enrolled. Enrollment counts and billed minutes show activity, not results.
Useful measures include emergency visits and admissions per enrolled patient, follow-up within a set period after discharge, control of relevant clinical measures such as blood pressure or blood sugar, medication adherence and patient-reported experience. Take care with comparisons: patients who agree to enroll often differ from those who decline.
Report process measures alongside outcomes, because they explain why results move. Time from discharge to first contact, share of care plans reviewed in the last quarter and share of patients reached each month show whether the program is operating as designed. If outcomes do not improve while process measures look good, the design itself needs another look.
Share results with care managers, not only with leadership. Staff who see that their follow-up calls reduced readmissions for their own patients are more likely to keep the habits that produced the result.
How Agnotic can help
Agnotic Technologies builds care management software for practices, health systems and digital health companies: eligibility lists and outreach, structured consent and care plans, admission and discharge alerts, prioritized worklists, automatic time tracking and outcome reporting.
We integrate it with the EHR, health information exchanges, pharmacy data and remote monitoring, so care managers work from one view instead of many.
Fix your care management workflow
Explore our care management solutions, or browse more remote care articles.
Related reading on Agnotic
See running a CCM program, CCM billing, PCM CPT codes and value-based care.
