Information Blocking

    Cures Act Information Blocking Compliance for Health IT

    A patient app asks for notes, a hospital wants a full record export and a partner wants an API, and every refusal or delay now needs a reason you can prove. Agnotic Technologies builds the request handling, reason codes and evidence that show your product does not block electronic health information.

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve

    What is Cures Act information blocking?

    Cures Act information blocking is a practice by a health care provider, certified health IT developer, or health information network or exchange that is likely to interfere with access, exchange or use of electronic health information, unless law requires it or an exception applies. Agnotic Technologies builds the software controls that show your product meets the rule.

    Decision table

    Which exception might apply to a request, and what must you log?

    Most requests should simply be fulfilled. When one is not, or is fulfilled differently, the system has to record why. These are common scenarios we design for. Your counsel decides whether an exception applies; the software records the facts they need.

    Request scenarioException that may applyWhat the system must log
    A patient's app asks for clinical notes through the APIUsually none: release them. Withholding a note needs a documented basis, such as preventing harmThe request, the app, what was released, and any item withheld with its reason code and the clinician who decided
    A provider asks for a full record export in a format you do not supportManner exception: offer an alternative manner in the order the rule setsFormat requested, why it could not be met, alternatives offered and the requestor's answer
    A request arrives during planned maintenance or an outageHealth IT performance exception, for no longer than necessary and applied consistentlyThe maintenance window, systems affected, notices sent and the time service was restored
    A clinician believes releasing a result now could harm the patientPreventing harm exception, based on an individualized judgment by a licensed health care professionalWho made the determination, the basis recorded, the data held back and for how long
    The requested data cannot be separated from data you may not shareInfeasibility exception, segmentation conditionThe reason, and the written response to the requestor within ten business days
    A developer wants API access and you charge a fee or require a licenceFees exception and licensing exceptionThe fee basis, the terms offered and evidence the same terms apply to similar requestors

    This table is engineering guidance, not legal advice. Agnotic Technologies builds the controls; your compliance team and counsel decide how each exception is used.

    Who is an actor, and which data must flow?

    The rule applies to three kinds of actor and to one defined set of data. Knowing which you are sets the knowledge standard you are judged by and the penalty you face.

    Health care providers

    Held to the standard of knowing a practice is unreasonable and likely to interfere. A provider found to have blocked faces disincentives applied by CMS, not an OIG fine.

    Developers of certified health IT

    Held to a knows or should know standard. The OIG can impose civil money penalties, so product decisions about exports, APIs and fees carry real risk.

    Health information networks and exchanges

    Held to the same knows or should know standard as developers. Network rules, onboarding terms and fees all fall within the rule.

    Electronic health information

    Electronic PHI that would be in a designated record set, whoever holds it. Psychotherapy notes and information compiled for legal proceedings are excluded.

    Exceptions for not fulfilling a request

    Preventing harm, privacy, security, infeasibility, health IT performance and protecting care access. Each has conditions that must all be met.

    Exceptions for how a request is fulfilled

    Manner, fees and licensing, plus the TEFCA manner exception for actors taking part in TEFCA. They govern format, price and terms rather than refusal.

    App gallery

    View All

    Lera Health

    Lera Health screenshot 1

    Health evolve

    Software controls

    Which software controls show you are not blocking?

    The rule is judged on practices, and practices leave traces in software. These are the controls we build so the traces exist and can be found.

    1.

    Request intake log

    Every request for EHI, from patients, apps, providers or partners, is logged with requestor, channel, scope and time, whether it arrives by API, portal or email.

    2.

    Reason codes

    Any delay, refusal or change of format needs a reason code tied to an exception, the person who chose it and a note, so nothing is withheld silently.

    3.

    Response timers

    Timers track open requests and the ten business day written response the infeasibility exception requires, with alerts before it lapses.

    4.

    Release without artificial delay

    Results and notes flow to the portal and API when final, and any hold is a documented, time-limited choice rather than a default setting.

    Facts and sources

    Which rules define information blocking?

    Short facts from the regulation, each linked to its primary source.

    • Information blocking is a practice that, unless required by law or covered by an exception, is likely to interfere with access, exchange or use of electronic health information. Developers, networks and exchanges are held to a knows or should know standard; providers to knowing the practice is unreasonable.

      Source: 45 CFR 171.103 (eCFR)
    • Electronic health information means electronic protected health information to the extent it would be included in a designated record set, excluding psychotherapy notes and information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil, criminal or administrative action.

      Source: 45 CFR 171.102 (eCFR)
    • An actor that does not fulfill a request under the infeasibility exception must, within ten business days of receiving the request, tell the requestor in writing why the request is infeasible.

      Source: 45 CFR 171.204(b) (eCFR)
    • The HHS Office of Inspector General may impose a civil money penalty of not more than $1,000,000 per violation for information blocking.

      Source: 42 CFR 1003.1410 (eCFR)
    • For health care providers that OIG finds have committed information blocking, CMS disincentives include not being a meaningful EHR user for eligible hospitals, critical access hospitals and MIPS eligible clinicians, and removal from the Medicare Shared Savings Program for at least one year for ACOs.

      Source: 45 CFR 171.1001 (eCFR)

    Which healthcare standards sit alongside information blocking work?

    01HIPAA logo

    HIPAA

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

    Protect PHI with privacy-first architecture, encrypted storage and transmission, strict access controls, and traceable audit logs.

    02GDPR logo

    GDPR

    General Data Protection Regulation

    Implement lawful consent flows, data minimization, retention controls, and secure processing for sensitive health data.

    03FHIR logo

    FHIR

    Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources

    Enable standardized health data exchange across apps, care teams, and systems through standards-based FHIR APIs.

    04HL7 logo

    HL7

    Health Level Seven International

    Support enterprise-grade interoperability with HL7-based integrations for records, events, and clinical messaging workflows.

    05HITRUST logo

    HITRUST

    Health Information Trust Alliance

    Align security programs to healthcare-specific control and risk management practices trusted by providers and ecosystem partners.

    06HITECH logo

    HITECH

    Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

    Design with breach notification readiness, digital record safeguards, and operational controls that support regulated care programs.

    07SaMD logo

    SaMD

    FDA Software as a Medical Device

    Plan software quality, traceability, and documentation pathways for products that may require SaMD review and submission.

    08MDR (EU) logo

    MDR (EU)

    Medical Device Regulation (European Union)

    Prepare EU market-ready processes for risk classification, evidence tracking, and lifecycle governance under MDR expectations.

    09SAMHSA logo

    SAMHSA

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

    Apply confidentiality controls and consent-aware sharing models for behavioral and mental health data experiences.

    Information blocking FAQs

    It applies to health care providers, developers of certified health IT, and health information networks and exchanges. If your product holds EHI for a provider client, its design can still decide whether that client blocks. Your counsel confirms your status; we build for it.

    Build compliantly

    How we deliver on this standard

    Related Services

    Related Integrations

    Related Solutions

    Related Comparisons

    Related Case Studies

    Related Checklists and Tools