A clinician holding a tablet with a medication list in a hospital corridor
    Software we build

    Medication Review Software for Alerts and Pharmacist Workload

    Drug pairs grow faster than medication lists, so interaction alerts and pharmacist review queues grow fastest for patients on many medications. Agnotic Technologies builds medication review software to your requirements.

    Last reviewed by the Agnotic Technologies engineering team

    Why does medication review workload grow so fast?

    Medication review workload grows fast because interaction screening compares every medication with every other one: a patient on n medications has n x (n minus 1) / 2 drug pairs. Agnotic Technologies builds medication review software that screens those pairs, tiers the alerts and routes the ones that need a pharmacist into a tracked review queue.

    Which medication review problems does this solve?

    Screening volume, alert volume and pharmacist time all rise with the length of the medication list.

    1. Pairs grow faster than lists

      Each new medication is checked against every existing one, so a list of 10 medications already has 45 pairs to screen.

    2. Alert fatigue

      When many screened pairs fire an alert, prescribers and pharmacists see more alerts than they can act on, and the important ones are harder to spot.

    3. Pharmacist queues nobody owns

      Alerts routed to a pharmacist pile up when the queue has no assignment or due times, and reviews not cleared the same day carry over.

    4. Alerts that are not drug pairs

      Drug-condition, drug-allergy and duplicate-therapy alerts are not pairs of medications, so they need their own rules and counts.

    5. Knowledge base differences

      Two interaction databases can flag different pairs for the same list, so alert volume changes when the knowledge base changes.

    6. No record of review decisions

      Without a stored record of each issue and how it was resolved, reviews cannot be counted, assigned or audited.

    What do we build for medication review?

    Agnotic Technologies builds medication review software to your requirements: your EHR, your licensed interaction knowledge base, your routing rules and your staffing.

    • Interaction screening service

      A service that screens every medication pair against your licensed interaction knowledge base at order, refill or review.

    • CDS Hooks integration

      Order-select and order-sign hooks that return interaction cards inside the EHR workflow, where the EHR supports CDS Hooks.

    • Severity tiering and duplicate suppression

      Rules that tier alerts by severity, suppress duplicates already acknowledged and decide which alerts reach a pharmacist.

    • Pharmacist review queue

      A worklist with assignment, due times and carry-over handling, so routed reviews are cleared or escalated.

    • Issues stored as FHIR DetectedIssue

      Each screening result stored with its severity and resolution, so reviews can be counted, assigned and audited like any other work item.

    • Medication therapy management workflows

      Comprehensive and targeted medication review workflows with written summaries, for Medicare Part D medication therapy management programs.

    • Audit and workload reporting

      Reports on alerts, overrides, review times and queue size by site and pharmacist.

    Why do drug pairs grow faster than the medication list?

    Interaction screening compares every medication with every other one. The newest medication is checked against all the existing ones, so a list of n medications gains n new pairs when one more is added.

    Pairs to screen by list length (pairs = n x (n minus 1) / 2)
    Active medicationsPairs to screenPairs added by the last medication
    211
    332
    5104
    8287
    10459
    1510514

    What does each volume size in the system?

    Ways to cut alert volume, such as severity tiering and duplicate suppression, are covered on our medication management software and clinical decision support pages.

    • Pairs screened: the calls your interaction checking service handles.
    • Alerts: the volume your alert display, logging and reporting must hold.
    • Routed reviews per working day: the pharmacist queue, how it splits across staff and what happens when it is not cleared the same day.
    • Pharmacist hours: whether the queue fits the hours you have.
    • Longer lists: how sensitive the queue is when every patient adds one more medication.

    Where do interaction alerts come from in an EHR?

    In an EHR that supports CDS Hooks, an interaction check can run when a clinician selects or signs an order, and the external service answers with cards shown in the workflow.

    A screening result can be stored as a FHIR DetectedIssue with a severity of high, moderate or low. Storing it that way lets routed reviews be counted, assigned and audited like any other work item.

    Checks outside pair screening

    • Drug-condition, drug-allergy and duplicate-therapy alerts. They are not pairs of medications, so they need their own count.
    • The severity mix. A queue of low-severity alerts and a queue of high-severity ones need different routing.
    • Knowledge base differences. Two interaction databases can flag different pairs for the same list, so an alert rate belongs to the knowledge base it was measured on.
    • Dose, route and timing checks that some systems run alongside pair screening.
    • Whether an alert is clinically right. Software counts and routes the work; the judgment stays with the pharmacist and prescriber.
    Facts and sources

    Which rules and standards shape medication review software?

    Short facts we design medication review workflows around, each linked to its primary source.

    • Medicare Part D medication therapy management programs must offer an annual comprehensive medication review with written summaries, including an interactive consultation by a pharmacist or other qualified provider, and quarterly targeted medication reviews.

      Source: 42 CFR 423.153(d) (eCFR)
    • CDS Hooks 2.0 lists order-select and order-sign among its hooks, the points where an EHR can call an external decision support service, and marks the older medication-prescribe hook as deprecated.

      Source: HL7 CDS Hooks 2.0
    • FHIR R4 DetectedIssue records an actual or potential clinical issue with or between active or proposed clinical actions for a patient, such as a drug-drug interaction, with a severity of high, moderate or low.

      Source: HL7 FHIR R4 DetectedIssue resource

    Trusted by global innovators

    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve
    Benchmark
    Chibasco
    Fundency
    Lantimer
    Lauren
    Lera
    One Minute
    Pento Pix
    TAP
    Xtrium
    Healthevolve

    Which standards does Agnotic build healthcare software against?

    01HIPAA logo

    HIPAA

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

    Protect PHI with privacy-first architecture, encrypted storage and transmission, strict access controls, and traceable audit logs.

    02GDPR logo

    GDPR

    General Data Protection Regulation

    Implement lawful consent flows, data minimization, retention controls, and secure processing for sensitive health data.

    03FHIR logo

    FHIR

    Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources

    Enable standardized health data exchange across apps, care teams, and systems through standards-based FHIR APIs.

    04HL7 logo

    HL7

    Health Level Seven International

    Support enterprise-grade interoperability with HL7-based integrations for records, events, and clinical messaging workflows.

    05HITRUST logo

    HITRUST

    Health Information Trust Alliance

    Align security programs to healthcare-specific control and risk management practices trusted by providers and ecosystem partners.

    06HITECH logo

    HITECH

    Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

    Design with breach notification readiness, digital record safeguards, and operational controls that support regulated care programs.

    07SaMD logo

    SaMD

    FDA Software as a Medical Device

    Plan software quality, traceability, and documentation pathways for products that may require SaMD review and submission.

    08MDR (EU) logo

    MDR (EU)

    Medical Device Regulation (European Union)

    Prepare EU market-ready processes for risk classification, evidence tracking, and lifecycle governance under MDR expectations.

    09SAMHSA logo

    SAMHSA

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

    Apply confidentiality controls and consent-aware sharing models for behavioral and mental health data experiences.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Count what your system does. If the full list is screened at every new order and refill, each screening compares every pair again, so workload follows orders rather than patients.